What I Got Wrong About Lockdowns

Uptown Theater, Minneapolis
The Uptown Theater in Minneapolis on March 28th. Photo by Lorie Shaull under a CC BY-SA 2.0 license.

Last March, I strongly advocated strict stay-at-home orders (aka “lockdowns”) throughout most of the United States. When they said “two weeks to bend the curve,” I immediately demanded extensions. When those extensions were granted, I cheered. When states began reopening in May, before meeting the benchmarks I (and the CDC) had set, I was profoundly disappointed.

Here is the basic pro-lockdown argument that I made:

  1. Left unchecked, covid would have infected and killed something like 1 million Americans.
  2. Lockdowns lasting 2-5 months (long enough to suppress the virus) would drastically reduce covid’s spread, saving several hundred thousand Americans.
  3. The likely benefit of saving several hundred thousand Americans (even mostly elderly Americans) was greater than the (likely catastrophic) economic cost.
  4. Therefore, we should impose lockdowns.

Many people disagreed with me.

At the time, at least in my Facebook circles, there were two main arguments against lockdowns:

~1. (Not-1) Covid isn’t very deadly, and will not kill more than 100,000 Americans in total. (The exact number used varied, a lot, but was most often between 50,000 and 100,000, because flu kills around that many Americans in a severe flu season.)

~3. (Not-3) Even if covid is going to kill a huge number of Americans, the economic costs of saving all those Americans will be so high that it won’t be worth it.

~3a. (Not-3, variant) Even if covid is going to kill a huge number of Americans, lockdowns will also cause a huge number of Americans to die (from suicide, untreated medical crises, et cetera), erasing the benefits of suppressing the virus.

Basically: covid isn’t that bad to begin with, and, even if it is, the lockdown cure is worse than the disease.

I am comfortable saying today that that those counter-arguments were wrong.

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on What I Got Wrong About Lockdowns

The Evil That Runs Through Everything

Some months ago, a friendly acquaintance saw a casual remark I made on a politics forum about how Democrats will never win in states like West Virginia because they are anti-unborn. My acquaintance objected: “Democrats aren’t anti-unborn. We just believe medical decisions like whether or not to have an abortion are best left to be decided between a women and her doctor.”

I replied, without rancor:

This is like saying that Roger Taney wasn’t anti-Black.

In fact, it’s exactly like that.

Now, I get it: you don’t think unborn people are people, and think it’s not just reasonable but necessary (for gender equality) to exclude them from legal personhood, the protections of the Constitution, and the 14th Amendment. Okay, that’s where you stand. We all know how abortion debates crash and burn in this thread, and we don’t need to have one tonight.

But declaring that you think the unborn have “no rights the [born] man is bound to respect” makes you — and the mainstream Democratic Party — anti-unborn. This is as plain as the fact that triangles have three sides. Please don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining.

(Roger Taney was the Supreme Court justice who authored Dred Scott v. Sandford.)

My acquaintance was infuriated. He demanded I apologize for my “insulting, disgusting” comparison to “a slave-owning SCOTUS justice” and contended that I had attacked the basic rules of civil discourse by drawing that parallel. He stated that there was no similarity between abortion and slavery, because of course everyone has always known that Blacks are full-fledged human persons, but nobody knows or ever can know whether unborn children are full-fledged human persons, in large part due to their limited cognitive abilities.

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Evil That Runs Through Everything

Watch the Joint Session to Count the Electors

Well, this will be a short-lived post, but the Joint Session to Count the Electors has started. I was going to watch this anyway, because I did so much work explaining how it might work in the course of my legal horror story, “And The War Came.” But now the President’s attempts to steal the election from President-Elect Biden have made this thing quite a big deal, so lots of folks are interested.

As always, the best place to watch Congressional floor action is on C-SPAN: https://www.c-span.org/video/?507663-1/joint-session-congress-counting-electoral-college-ballots

An excellent overview of the process from the Congressional Research Service is here: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32717.pdf

The session started one minute ago. Please enjoy! Or dread. Either way.

UPDATE 12:13 PM:

The Joint Session to Count the Electoral Votes has opened. First thing that happens is Pelosi clears most of the floor for social distancing reasons. Someone (I missed who) raises a point of parliamentary inquiry asking how they can raise points of parliamentary inquiry and points of order if they’re stuck in the gallery. Pence gavels him down for being out of order. This is basically right and indirectly answers the question: members generally *cannot* raise points of parliamentary inquiry or points of order during this session. There is a possible exception. It is believed that a WRITTEN point of order signed by a Representative and a Senator can be considered, but only through a burdensome process. However, this has never been done.

UPDATE 12:18 PM:

And it has begun: the electoral votes from Arizona for Biden have received a formal objection. This is the third formal objection since the modern law was imposed in 1887. (The other two were in 1969 and 2005.) The objection — written and signed by both a Representative and a Senator — contends that the electoral votes of Arizona were not “regularly given”. Correctly, it does not go into detail. (That’s saved for the debate floor.)


The Joint Session is dissolved temporarily. Both houses will now debate the objection (separately, in their own chambers) for one hour two hours (sorry, brain fart). The Arizona electors will be rejected only if BOTH houses agree to reject them.

Note that, while Democrats won control of the Senate last night, their winners have not yet taken office, so Republicans still have narrow control of the Senate. This does not really matter, since there’s no way this objection will win support from moderates, textualists, pro-Constitution members of the Senate. Still worth mentioning.

UPDATE: 1:28 PM:

After a predictable debate along predictable lines, violence has disrupted the electoral count. Facts are unclear, but both houses are now in recess, reportedly due to protestors breaching the building. Rumor that Vice President Pence has been evacuated.

Needless to say, as in the case of protestors destroying important symbols like statues, protesters trying to derail our basic republican institutions should be met by all necessary force, including (if necessary) lethal force.

UPDATE 2:35 PM:

Look, if you’re still following my blog at this point, stop. It’s chaos. There’s an ongoing riot, capitol police has lost control, the White House is reportedly refusing to deploy National Guard (which seems like it meets the legal definition of seditious conspiracy? but maybe we’ll sort that out later), and this blog is not the place to get your news. Feel free to make use of one of my favorite Twitter lists for tracking current political events, CheckmarkPolitics.

Posted in Mere Opinion | Comments Off on Watch the Joint Session to Count the Electors

Special Comment on the Cruz Electoral College Objection

One critique of originalism
The joint session to count the electoral votes, 1925

I haven’t blogged for a while–it was Christmas, I have a life, and my mea culpa post on lockdowns can wait a few more weeks–but I posted on Facebook about Sen. Ted Cruz’s objections to Congressional certification, and was asked to make that post more widely shareable. It’s been a while since my last special comment, but this seems like an appropriate occasion to make another.

The appropriate penalty for signing the Ted Cruz electoral college objection letter is immediate, lifelong banishment from the United States, and all its territories and possessions. The Speech & Debate Clause (among other things) ensures this will never happen, but, in a just world, these Senators, and their collaborators in the House of Representatives — these arsonists against our Republic — would never be allowed to freely breathe its air again.

I’m not fanatical about this. I thought that Sen. Hawley’s symbolic objection to Pennsylvania’s electoral votes was a Pretty Bad Idea, but a defensible one. He said he wanted to use the electoral certification process to make a soapbox against the Pennsylvania judiciary and executive branch’s blatant usurpation of legislative powers, but his objection would not have overturned the election result even if successful. Stupid to use the delicate vehicle of presidential legitimacy for soapboxing–and it was even stupider when Barbara Boxer did it in 2005–but not obviously an attempt to burn the basis of constitutional self-government (free and fair elections) to the ground.

But the Cruz letter is simply shameless. It cites “widespread allegations” of voter fraud as an excuse to institute a national committee to investigate voter fraud. This ignores the overwhelming and definitive evidence that, while voter fraud and election cheating did happen in the 2020 election, it did not come close to affecting the outcome.

(If you don’t like those links, I can link you to court ruling after court ruling showing, in detail, how empty the Trump Campaign’s claims are. If you still believe, falsely, that courts have thrown these cases out simply on standing grounds without considering the evidence, that only shows me that you have been reading misleading or outright fraudulent right-wing press reports about the rulings, not the rulings themselves.)

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Special Comment on the Cruz Electoral College Objection

Some of Minnesota’s ICU Beds are a Mirage (and that’s Very Very Bad)

If you look at the Minnesota Department of Health’s hospital capacity stats today, they don’t look that bad.

There’s an even more soothing version of this data circulating on certain Minnesota-centric Facebook groups:

Ordinary ICU bed usage (in non-covid times) is like 850, and we’re at 1150… but we have 1450 beds and an extra 400 available for a surge. So we’re okay, right? We’re pushing up toward capacity but still have a looooooooong way to go before we get there. Right?

Not right. I’ve been posting these MDH hospital capacity stats regularly for months in my weather reports, but, over the past two weeks, I started to hear various kinds of pushback from various friends (or friends of friends) who work in hospitals. They’re telling me that, sure, the beds exist, MDH is right enough about that… but we’re nearly out of medical staff.

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Comments Off on Some of Minnesota’s ICU Beds are a Mirage (and that’s Very Very Bad)

Biden Won

I wrote this on Facebook yesterday (Wednesday) at 10:06 PM. If anything, it’s even more true now than it was then, so I figured it worth posting here as well.

You can look at each state that’s out and say, “Hey, Trump has a chance. He could get lucky.” So why have I been saying that the race as a whole isn’t a tossup? Let’s break it down.

There’s two states where Trump is currently favored: North Carolina and Georgia.

There’s three states where Biden is favored: Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Nevada.

To win, Trump has to hold the states where he’s favored, then get lucky in Pennsylvania plus one other state. So he has to get a little lucky twice, then VERY lucky twice. It’s easy to imagine Trump getting VERY lucky once, but he has to roll lucky four times in a row — and his most important state, Pennsylvania, looks like his toughest right now.

Meanwhile…

To win, Biden has to either hold Pennsylvania* OR the other two states where he’s favored… and nothing else. So he needs to get a little lucky once, and that’s it. If he gets unlucky in PA (or loses a Pennsylvania lawsuit that sways the vote total), then Biden has a fallback: he needs to get a little lucky twice in the Southwest. But he has a fallback for that, too: he can win by getting VERY lucky once and winning one of the Southeast states in play. Trump has no fallbacks.

Trump’s BEST path forward is to hold Georgia and North Carolina, flip Arizona, and then win a lawsuit in Pennsylvania that somehow invalidates what looks like a fairly comfortable Biden margin. But… urk. Every path I see for Trump is as weird and convoluted and unlikely as the paths that panicked network anchors started drawing on the walls at 12:30 AM on Election Night 2016, by which time I was openly mocking them.

That’s why I think it’s over.

I’m going to lose the $0.60 I bet on an official race call coming before midnight Wednesday. There will be no call tonight [Wednesday], because networks are being appropriately cautious. It might be another week. In the meantime, I honestly don’t know whether Arizona will stay blue (it really might flip! and Georgia might just as easily flip to blue!).

Nevertheless, one way or another, and for whatever it’s worth, I project that Joseph Biden is President-Elect of the United States.

WHAT ABOUT FRAUD?

I trust the Trump campaign will take all evidence of fraud to court, and I trust the court system (now largely staffed, at the federal level, by sound judges) to sort it out. I do not think Trump has much hope here, given the margins, but I am open to being wrong. We do need to count all the valid votes and discount all the invalid ones, and I support that process.

My projection of President-Elect Biden does not take into account the possibility of rampant voter fraud being proved and removed. So that’s a path for Trump.

But this would require a fraud conspiracy on a scale not even seriously alleged in American politics since the 1960 presidential election. (And, even there, it’s pretty unclear whether the alleged fraud actually changed the result of the election.)

*NOTE: Yes, Pennsylvania still shows Trump in the lead, but that lead is down to less than 2 points. It was 14 points this morning. Trump is very much on track to lose PA and would have to get quite lucky not to. That’s why I said yesterday morning to ignore everything PA did on Election Night.

Posted in Mere Opinion | Comments Off on Biden Won

Covid Weather Report for Minnesota, Guy Fawkes Day

OVERALL:

Minnesota is in the midst of a very dangerous outbreak of covid-19, the likes of which we have not seen before. The situation is much worse today than it was at any time during the lockdown.

DETAIL:

I put the data in, ran this chart, and swore:

This data lags by seven days. “LTC” is short for “long-term care” (basically, nursing homes).

There are a lot of cases circulating right now. My rough estimate is that there are about 75,000 Minnesotans right now who are either pre-symptomatic or early symptomatic — probably walking around and potentially infecting you.

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Covid Weather Report for Minnesota, Guy Fawkes Day

Three Ways to Watch the Election Returns: 2020 Pandemic Edition

The day of the Brexit vote, the very first constituency to report results, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, reported a defeat for Brexit, 51%-49%. The defeat for Brexit there was expected. However, the margin was wrong: experts had expected Brexit to fail in Newcastle by 12 points, not 2 points. Newcastle had been a “safe state” for Brexit that turned into a narrow win.

Wakota Life Care center
Buckle up, chums! This is the grand finale of America’s favorite pasttime, and–unlike the Super Bowl–there will be lots of math!

I was over at my parents’ for dinner, just buzzing by the computer for a quick results check, didn’t even bother sitting down—and I remember seeing that result, sitting down heavily, and thinking, “Welp. The U.K. just left the E.U.”

The rest of the night went the same. Areas that were expected to vote for Brexit by a narrow margin voted for it by a large margin; areas that were expected to oppose it by narrow margins ended up supporting it by narrow margins. There were a few places where the anti-Brexit “Bremain” vote did better than expected, as there always are… but not many. Networks finally called the race hours after the result was clear.

This happened again in the 2016 presidential election. I told my family at 8:15 PM that Trump was very probably the President, because I could see that all the states Trump needed were getting called for him (or were on the cusp of it), and all the states Clinton needed were tossups… most of them leaning red.

I don’t expect that to happen again. President Trump starts today in a much worse position than he was in last time around. Last time, I told you that all Trump needed was a small polling error in his favor to win, that those kinds of polls happened all the time,and that the pundits were wildly underestimating Trump’s chances. Today, if anything, I think pundits (always fighting the last war!) are overestimating Trump’s chances. Last time, the polls were within the margin of historically normal error. That wouldn’t be nearly enough this time. But Trump could still pull it off. Totally plausible. Meanwhile, Republicans have a real shot at holding the Senate, or losing it only narrowly. So let’s take a look at three different ways we can track the race as it unfolds:

Congress-Level

Every seat in the House of Representatives is up for election this year, as usual. Congressional races are probably going to be the earliest (easily-accessible) indicator we have of how the night is going.

Here’s my Newcastle-upon-Tyne for Election 2020, my start-of-the-night bellwether:

Kentucky’s 6th Congressional District race between Rep. Andy Barr (R) and challenger Josh Hicks (D). Here is the Wikipedia article on the district, and here is the FiveThirtyEight race projection.

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Three Ways to Watch the Election Returns: 2020 Pandemic Edition

West Saint Paul City Council: The Wakota Incident

Guiding Star Wakota (formerly known as the Wakota Life-Care Center) is a charity which provides ultrasounds, childbirth and breastfeeding classes, pregnancy tests, material assistance (diapers, clothes, pack-n-plays, etc.), referrals, and other services to pregnant mothers in need of help.

Wakota Life Care center
Wakota Life Care Center, old building. Photo by Dave Hrbacek.

In late 2019, Wakota sought to construct a new building, due to significant overcrowding in its current building. In order to do this, Wakota needed the City of West Saint Paul to sign off on its site plan and plat, as well as (optionally) a conditional use permit allowing Wakota to provide additional medical services now or in the future.

Wakota worked through its plan carefully with city staff, and ultimately arrived at a plan that (subject to various routine conditions) complied with the city zoning code. As Planning Commissioner Morgan Kavanaugh has noted elsewhere (speaking generally, not about Wakota):

[M]uch of our work is not opinion based. The question before us is often, “Does this meet our code and plans?” If the answer is yes, we should not vote no just because we don’t like the specific use or look of the building.

Non-political city staff, including City Attorney Kori Land, follow this rule. Denying an application that meets all legal requirements is, generally speaking, illegal, and cities that try it are held accountable in court. Applying that standard to Wakota, West Saint Paul’s staff and attorney recommended approval of the Wakota site plan and plat.*

The Anti-Wakota Campaign

Nevertheless, when the Wakota permits came before the Planning Commission in January 2020, several members of the public tried to persuade the Commission to reject the permits to which Wakota was legally entitled. The reasons they gave ranged from their objection to the notion that a charity for pregnant mothers would not provide or refer for abortion, to concerns about the size of the building, to the rejection (by some of them) of the science that birth control pills increase some cancer risks. A number of their concerns invoked hypotheticals, or other crisis pregnancy centers entirely unaffiliated with Wakota. This came as a surprise to Wakota, which had expected the Planning Commission meeting to be routine.

The Planning Commission makes non-binding recommendations to the City Council, but is supposed to align its recommendations with the law. After this hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously voted against recommending approval for the site plan and plat,* but for no evident lawful reason.

When the permits came before the City Council, the same members of the public spoke in opposition to the permits, for similar reasons. However, the city staff and city attorney once again recommended approval of the site plan and plat. Meanwhile, clients and supporters of Wakota came out in large numbers to speak in support of the center and its expansion plans. (As City Attorney Land noted during the lengthy public hearing, most of what was discussed–on both sides–was not legally relevant and could not lawfully be considered by the council.)

How Each City Council Candidate Responded

Ward 1

Bob Pace (campaign)

Mr. Pace was on the Council and voted to approve the Wakota permits because they complied with the zoning ordinance and Wakota appeared to be legally entitled to them.

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on West Saint Paul City Council: The Wakota Incident

Minnesota Presidential Electors, 2020

Let’s start with the payload: here are Minnesota’s major-party electors. I’ve looked up and linked to public information about each elector if I could find any. In any event, when you’re deciding whom to cast your vote for on election night, I encourage you to consider not just your party’s nominee, but your party’s electors. After all, the electors are the ones you’re actually voting for!

Republican Party

  1. Sam Adjei
  2. Janet Beihoffer
  3. Jennifer Carnahan
  4. James Carson
  5. Paul Gazelka
  6. David Hallman
  7. Eric Lucero
  8. Jodi Stauber
  9. Carol Stevenson
  10. Charlie Strickland, Jr.

Alternates:

  1. Neal Breitbarth
  2. Terrence F. Flower
  3. [unreadable]
  4. John R. Rheinberger
  5. Anton J. Lazzaro
  6. Michelle Benson
  7. Peter James Balesa
  8. Jacob Ringstad
  9. Julie Ann Schmidt
  10. Rebekah Mae Lonnes

Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party

  1. Melvin Aanerud
  2. Muhammad Abdurrahman (despite being a faithless elector in ’16!)
  3. Joel Heller
  4. Nausheena Hussain
  5. Nancy Larson
  6. Mark Liebow
  7. Roxanne Mindeman
  8. Cheryl Poling
  9. Diana Tastad-Damer
  10. Travis Thompson

Alternates:

  1. Linda Wunderlich
  2. Greg Hansen
  3. Ben Hackett
  4. D’Andre Gordon
  5. Alfreda Daniels
  6. Zarina Baber
  7. Alan Perish
  8. Helen Clanaugh
  9. Renita Fisher
  10. Henry Fischer

For the delegates and alternates from the Green Party, Birthday Party (Kanye West), Independence Party (Brock Pierce), Socialism and Liberation, Socialist Workers, and the Judean People’s Front, as well as the documentation for DFL/GOP delegates, see these documents which the Minnesota Secretary of State’s office very kindly scanned and emailed to me today in the midst of a pandemic. (Big thank you to Stella Hegg at the MN SoS office!):

2020 List of Electors and Alternates – Minnesota – 28 October 2020


American Solidarity Party (registered write-in)

  1. Eric Saathoff

Under Minnesota law, parties are only required to register one elector prior to the election, and the write-in Brian Carroll campaign has done just that this year. Since the American Solidarity Party only wins if a plurality of Minnesotans write in “Brian Carroll” on their presidential ticket, it seems unlikely that we will get to learn more about this particular quirk of Minnesota law.


When you vote for a presidential candidate on Election Day, you don’t actually cast a vote for that candidate. You are actually voting for a slate of presidential electors who have been bound to that candidate. Whichever slate gets the most votes, wins the state.*

The winning slate of presidential electors meets in the state capitol in the third week of December. There, they cast the actual votes for president (and vice-president). They mail their votes to the Vice-President (currently Mike Pence), who brings them to Congress in the first week of January for the official electoral count. (For more on this count, and how it can go wrong, see my legal horror story, “And The War Came“.) Whichever candidate wins a majority of the electoral votes (270 out of 538) is elected President. If no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes, the Twelfth Amendment “throws” the election to the House of Representatives, which is allowed to pick any of the top three electoral college vote-getters to be President.

Continue reading
Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Minnesota Presidential Electors, 2020